Dear Colleague:

World Population Day 2006 witnessed calls for more of the same globally
destructive programs.

Steven W. Mosher
President

PRI Weekly Briefing
20 July 2006
Vol. 8, No. 28


World Population Aging 2006
By Joseph A. D'Agostino


Few of you likely noticed, but July 11 was World Population Day 2006.  On
that day, the United Nations, its various agencies and allied
organizations, and those in the mainstream media who cared celebrated the
need for fewer human beings and more left-wing social engineering in the
Third World.  I never cease to be amazed at how ideology blinds people to
obvious realities, such as the coming population aging crisis and the
failure of sex education and condom distribution to halt the AIDS
epidemic.

Just last fall, the United Nations Population Division (UNDP) released
another comprehensive report on rapid aging in the First World and on an
even worse upcoming trend of population aging in the Third World.  That's
correct, the UNDP believes that population aging in the developing world
will be even more precipitous than the aging currently afflicting Europe,
Japan, Canada, and the United States, where social security and health
care systems are already starting to go bankrupt though population aging
is just getting started.  The UNDP expects the aging predicted to begin in
earnest mid-century in Asia, the Middle East, and Latin America to happen
more dramatically than it is happening now in Europe, where the elderly
already outnumber children-and this in countries which will have a
fraction of the financial resources to deal with the problem.

Sub-Saharan Africa still has high birthrates, but unless the AIDS epidemic
is brought under control there, it could suffer the same fate.

A few statistics to illustrate the trend: The proportion of those 80 or
older will go from 1.3% of the world population today to 4.3% by 2050,
when those under 14-the world's future workers-will decline from 28.2% to
20.2%.  The number of elderly dependents per 100 working-aging people
worldwide will go from 17 today to 37 in 2050.  In less developed
countries, the figures are 13 today to 34 in 2050.  Can the Third World
afford to support almost triple the proportion of old people?  But
working-age people will get a break at the other end of the dependency
spectrum, however.  The UNDP helpfully notes that the overall dependency
ratio will not triple by 2050 because there will be so few children.  Of
course, in the years after 2050, when those few children grow up to be the
few working-age people with an ever greater number of elderly..

The UNDP puts the biggest aging crunch in the Third World as a whole
(individual countries vary in their demographic profiles, of course) after
2050 only because it assumes that birthrates in all nations will stabilize
around 1.85 children per woman.  There is no reason to believe that and
every reason to believe that, barring dramatic changes in cultural
priorities and government policies, birthrates in most nations will
continue their downward plunge to well below 1.85.  Many nations in both
developed and less developed regions have already experienced such a
plunge, and until-recently-fruitful nations such as Mexico, Brazil, and
even India will soon join them.  China is already at 1.7, but likely to
hold steady since her largely poor and rural population would prefer to
have more children but is kept artificially unprocreative by force.
Replacement rate fertility in a stable society is around 2.1.

One important statistic to note: The idea that the world population
experienced a dramatic boom in the proportion of young people after World
War II due to decreased childhood mortality and other improved living
conditions, necessitating population control measures that saved us from
an unsustainable infestation of rugrats, is not true.  "At the world
level, the population in 1950 was relatively young, having 34% of its
members under age 15 and barely 8% aged 60 or over," says UNDP.  This was
despite the fertility decline of the Great Depression and the massive loss
of young lives in World War II.  "Between 1950 and 1975, as mortality
decline accelerated, particularly in the less developed regions, both the
proportion under age 15 and that aged 60 or over increased, to reach 37%
and about 9% respectively.  Overall, therefore, the population of the
world became slightly younger from 1950 to 1975."  So the world remained
in demographic balance, and major demographic changes did not take place
until after 1975-after population control and feminism had begun to take
firm hold in most of the world.

And now population control has lead to the specter of rapid population
aging and attendant social and economic decline as fewer and fewer workers
attempt to support more and more elderly, first in the First World, then
globally.  The UNDP urges that action be taken soon, before the crisis
gets out of hand.  What did those at the pinnacle of the international
community in influence and funds have to say on World Population Day 2006?

"This year on World Population Day, the focus is on young people," said
Thoraya Ahmed Obaid, Executive Director of the United Nations Population
Fund (UNFPA).  Everything she suggested to solve the world's problems
would reduce childbearing, the UNFPA's main goal for decades.  She
advocated more "family planning" and less "risks of pregnancy and
childbirth."  UNFPA issued documents calling for more "gender equality"
(that is, more women working instead of caring for children).  UNFPA wants
more education for girls because "girls who are educated are likely to
marry later and to have smaller, healthier families."  In fact, one of the
primary UNFPA talking points for World Population Day is, "Universal
access to reproductive health, including family planning, is the starting
point for a better future for the 1.5 billion young people (ages 10 to 24)
who live in developing countries."

Where is the recognition of population aging?  Where is the encouragement
for people in countries with falling birthrates to have more children to
avert the coming crisis?  Nowhere.  Hopefully, before it is too late, the
warnings of the UNDP and others will eventually penetrate into the elite
circles where ideology and policies are made.


Joseph A. D'Agostino is Vice President for Communications at the
Population Research Institute.

_________
PRI
P.O. Box 1559
Front Royal, Va. 22630
USA
Phone: (540) 622-5240 Fax: (540) 622-2728
Email: jad@pop.org
Media Contact: Joseph A. D'Agostino
(540) 622-5240, ext. 204
Website: www.pop.org
_________
(c) 2006 Population Research Institute. Permission to reprint granted.
Redistribute widely. Credit required.
_________
If you would like to make a tax-deductible donation to PRI, please go to
http://pop.org/donate.cfm. All donations (of any size) are welcomed and
appreciated. _________
To subscribe to the Weekly Briefing, go to:
http://pop.org/subscribe-weekly.cfm or email us at pri@pop.org and say
"Add me to your Weekly Briefing."
The pro-life Population Research Institute is dedicated to ending human
rights abuses committed in the name of "family planning," and to ending
counter-productive social and economic paradigms premised on the myth of
"overpopulation."