KARL KEATING'S E-LETTER

June 21, 2005

TOPIC:

IS THE CHURCH LIKELY TO SHRINK--AND SHOULD IT?

Dear Friend of Catholic Answers:

The answer to that question is: It depends on where you live.

In some places the Church is growing fast--Africa, for example, where
Catholics were 12 percent of the population 25 years ago but now are 17
percent. The talk in such places is not about whether the Church will or
should shrink; it is about how to manage runaway growth. It is a nice
problem to have.

In other places Church participation is in decline, Europe being the most
obvious example, but America is in this category too. A few decades ago
three out of four American Catholics attended Mass regularly. Now the
proportion is one out of four. It is a little hard to brag about having 65
million American Catholics when only 16 million of them show up on Sundays.

Catholics are 23 percent of the U.S. population. If you subtract the nominal
("Christmas and Easter") Catholics and consider only regular Mass-goers, you
can say that active Catholics are a mere 6 percent of the national
population. Using the same formula, forty years ago they were 18 percent.

Once upon a time Hollywood feared the Legion of Decency because the studios
could not afford to have priests instruct tens of millions of Catholics not
to attend particular movies. There is no such fear today. There are
proportionately fewer Catholics in the pews to hear such instructions, and
no such instructions are given anyway.

Older Catholics can remember a time when American bishops were paid
attention to not just by Catholics but by the general public, even by
political leaders. If you were a politician, you may not have agreed with
someone like Francis Cardinal Spellman of New York, but you didn't cross him
either. He had clout.

Does any American prelate have clout today? I can't think of one. They have
no clout partly because they do not try to exercise any but also because to
have clout you need to have a committed or sizeable constituency behind you.
Six percent is not sizeable and does not suggest much commitment.

How did we come to this pass? Ironically, the Catholic Church's present-day
unimportance in the U.S. is largely a consequence of a "big tent" mentality:
Church leaders have not wanted to lose anyone, no matter how marginally
Catholic. The result has been a Church that is big and flaccid and almost
without influence. (Who pays attention to USCCB position papers?)

For the Church in this country to regain influence, it needs to shrink
first, on the principle that if you want a fruit tree to grow and to produce
good fruit, you must prune it aggressively.

This is precisely what Pope Benedict XVI has been quoted as saying about the
Church as a whole: A smaller Church is more likely to be a "creative
minority." A Church from which the heterodox take an early retirement will
be internally more cohesive and can set itself some modest goals, such as
getting back to the business of converting the whole world.

A smaller, more orthodox, and more cohesive Church, one relieved of the
burden of people who maintain membership in it primarily in order to oppose
it (as some people remain registered in a political party only so they can
vote against certain candidates in the primary elections)--such a Church is
free to grow. It is free to be itself. It will end up doing more good for
more people than it could have while paralyzed through internal bickerings.

In last week's E-Letter I mentioned Rosemary Radford Ruether, whom admirers
describe as "a pioneer Christian feminist theologian over 30 years." Her
current shtick is "female divinities." Christianity, she says, was
constructed for the benefit of men and therefore presents God as male. What
is needed is a parallel construction for the benefit of women. She is a
great fan of "goddess spirituality."

This is not new thinking--in one form or another it has been around since
the sixties, and it certainly is not Christian thinking. If Ruether's
theology were spread out before you, without your being told which religion,
if any, she subscribed to, you would not guess that what was limned was
Catholicism.

Why do people such as Ruether cling to the title but not to the content of
the faith? Partly it is because of clout. What little they have is a
consequence of their being thought of as Catholics. If Ruether described
herself as "a non-Christian New Ager," would her writings be taken as
seriously as they are? Of course not. Where is Starhawk now?

I have no insight into what Pope Benedict will do to make the Church a
"creative minority." I think the Church in this country will trend that way
no matter what.

Someone like Rosemary Radford Ruether may stick it out until the bitter end,
but over time many nominal Catholics will conform to truth-in-advertising
principles and will start calling themselves something else. They will give
up pretending to be what they manifestly are not. More importantly, they
will give up trying to make the Church into what it is not. They will find
another sandbox to play in.

Even though things will go this way regardless, the Pope is positioned to
give real momentum to the shift, and I hope he does, for everyone's sake. He
could invite some people, particularly those with notoriety, to find their
religious home elsewhere, but I hardly expect him to do that. I don't think
he needs to.

All he needs to do is to remove their wiggle room by defining and
reiterating Catholic teaching ever more strongly.

The people who attend Call to Action conferences still push for women's
ordination, arguing that the male-only priesthood is a cultural artifact,
not an irreformable dogma. They pay scant attention to "Ordinatio
Sacerdotalis" or to the later dubium, signed by then-Cardinal Ratzinger,
which affirmed the infallibility of the Church's teaching that woman cannot
be ordained.

But what if Pope Benedict issued a decree, couched in the plain and
traditional language of infallible teachings, saying that it is now and
always will be impossible to ordain women, take it or leave it?

I think a fair number would leave it, and in the long run that would be good
for them and for the Church. It would be good for them because they no
longer would be living a lie, and there would be hope that, at length, they
would wake up, see the wisdom of the Catholic position, and come home--as
fully Catholic. I've seen it happen.

Until next time,

Karl

********************

Yikes! I guess people actually do read these asterisked notes. Last week I
said that we expect to have a full house on this year's Catholic Answers
apologetics cruise and that once our reserved staterooms are gone, they're
gone.

I have told that there was a big bump in sign-ups in the last seven days.
Many thanks, but this means we might well reach our limit in July--and then
we'll have to start turning people away.

If you think you might want to join us on the cruise, which departs Los
Angeles on November 6 and returns from the Mexican Riviera on November 13,
please don't put off visiting our special web site:
http://www.catholicanswerscruise.com

********************

If you have a comment about anything appearing in this E-Letter, please do
not hit your Reply button. Instead, go to Catholic Answers' discussion
forums at http://forums.catholic.com, where you may post your comment in the
forum dedicated to the E-Letter. You will find a thread devoted to this
issue of the E-Letter. Feel free to add your comment in the form of a reply
to that thread.

********************

To subscribe to Karl Keating's E-Letter, send an e-mail to
eletter@catholic.com and write "SUBSCRIBE" in the subject line or go to
http://www.catholic.com/newsletters.asp.

********************

If you do not wish to receive Karl Keating's E-Letter, send an e-mail to
eletter@catholic.com and write "CANCEL" in the subject line.

********************

To change your e-mail address, send an e-mail to eletter@catholic.com and
write "ADDRESS CHANGE" in the subject line. Important: In the body of the
message, be sure to give both your old and new e-mail addresses.

********************

To learn more about the Catholic faith and about Catholic Answers, visit us
at http://www.catholic.com.

********************

The content of this E-Letter is copyright 2005 by Karl Keating.