Dear Colleague:

Pope and President have taken a stand against the dictatorship of
relativism, as did the Bishop of Madison, Wis. at the National Catholic
Prayer Breakfast.  Have you?

Steven W. Mosher
President

PRI Weekly Briefing
11 April 2006
Vol. 8 / No. 15


Catholics, Bush, & the Dictatorship of Relativism
By Joseph A. D'Agostino

Only in its third year, the National Catholic Prayer Breakfast has become
one of the premier events for Catholics in the nation.  Close to 2,000
people attended this year's breakfast held Friday, April 7 at the Hilton
Washington in Washington, D.C., with Culture of Life Foundation President
Austin Ruse as Master of Ceremonies.  Not a slice of bacon was to be seen.
 President Bush spoke for the second year in a row, but with all due
respect to the President, Bishop Robert C. Morlino of Madison, Wis. gave a
much more interesting speech.

The gracious President pointed out that Chief Justice John Roberts was
present.  When this was mentioned, Roberts received louder applause than
the President had when he was introduced.  "I appreciate so very much the
Chief Justice joining us," said President Bush.  "I'm proud you're here,
Chief Justice."

The President struck his own rhetorical blow against the dictatorship of
relativism.  "In some of the most advanced parts of our world, some people
no longer believe that the desire for liberty is universal," Bush said.
"Some people believe you cannot distinguish between right and wrong.  The
Catholic Church rejects such a pessimistic view of human nature, and
offers a vision of human freedom and dignity rooted in the same
self-evident truths of America's Founding. . . . Freedom is a gift from
the Almighty, and because it is universal, our Creator has written it into
all nature.  To maintain this freedom, societies need high moral
standards.  And the Catholic Church and its institutions play a vital role
in helping our citizens acquire the character we need to live as free
people."

It's an odd world in which many of President Bush's fiercest critics, from
George Soros on down, say they detest him most because of his firm belief
in good and evil.

The President cited the Pope on what sort of character our society should
have.  "Like his predecessor, Pope Benedict understands that the measure
of a free society is how it treats the weakest and most vulnerable among
us," Bush said.  "In his Christmas homily, the Pope noted that the Savior
came to earth as a 'defenseless child,' and said that the splendor of that
Christmas shines upon every child, born and unborn.  Here in the United
States, we work to strengthen a culture of life, through many state and
federal initiatives that expand the protections of the unborn.  These
initiatives reflect the consensus of the American people acting through
their elected representatives, and we will continue to work for the day
when every child is welcome in life and protected in law."  Amen.

Bishop Morlino gave a forceful speech exploring the impetus behind and
techniques of that dictatorship of relativism that Bush implicitly
condemned.  His Excellency quoted Pope Benedict XVI, who, just before his
elevation, gave a speech in which he said, "We are building a dictatorship
of relativism that does not recognize anything as definitive and whose
ultimate goal consists solely of one's own ego and desires.  We, however,
have a different goal: the Son of God, the true man.  He is the measure of
true humanism."  Added Morlino, "I would note that just this past January,
Pope Benedict spoke of policies which promote contraception and abortion
as 'a dogma of hedonism' which opens the door to the culture of death."

The bishop said that specific people, whom he choose not to name, promote
the dictatorship of relativism.  "We all know that the mass media are
generally accomplices to those who govern the dictatorship of relativism;
they are generally not innocent bystanders or detached journalists who
report in an objective way," he said.  "Willing cooperators in this
dictatorship are also those who live their lives according to polling
results, frequently sponsored by the mass media."

He noted that glaring inconsistencies in American life and law are not
aberrations, but are part and parcel of relativism.  After all, there is
no imperative for a relativist to be consistent.  "This inconsistency is
especially neuralgic because the civil law is our teacher," he said.  "We
have the very same individuals protesting against warrantless surveillance
of possible terrorists' activities, and then in the northwest, affirming
warrantless surveillance of people's garbage containers to ensure that no
recyclables are to be found.  On the one hand, warrantless surveillance
with regard to possible terrorism is politically incorrect while
warrantless surveillance of personal garbage is politically correct. . . .
A second example of this inconsistency has to do with killing of a mother
who is carrying a child.  In certain instances, the murderer is charged
with the death of two human beings, both mother and child.  However, if a
woman exercises her alleged reproductive rights and has an abortion, the
law clearly determines that no crime of murder has been committed.  Thus,
a human life is precious when someone thinks it is, be it a parent or be
it a civil court, and when that life is deemed not to be human or
otherwise be without value, then it is expendable."

Those with a little understanding of human nature, and who have absorbed
the lessons of George Orwell's 1984, know that law and action follow
language.  "The second weapon in the arsenal of those who would dictate
relativism to the rest of us consists in a series of linguistic
redefinitions, euphemisms, and other anomalies," Bishop Morlino pointed
out.  "Language, as the philosopher Heidegger said, 'is the house of
being.'  If our language is contorted and deconstructed through
euphemisms, redefinitions and other anomalies, then the being housed by
language becomes indeterminate.  There are no fixed meanings, that is
relativism pushed to its pinnacle, nihilism itself. . . . Our society
speaks of openness and tolerance as almost supreme virtues, but to be open
means precisely to be closed to the objective truth.  If one would claim
the existence of objective truth, one is considered closed and arrogant,
rather than open and tolerant.  So go the language games.  The euphemistic
approach is perhaps best captured by the words 'late-term abortion.'  This
term covers up the fact that a partially-born human being is brutally
murdered in the process of being born."

"Choice" has long been a term of great power, appealing to many Americans,
but curiously, it is consistently applied to only one issue.  "I've never
heard anyone defend a pro-choice position with regard to bank robbery,"
Morlino noted.  "The only time this expression is used without reference
to what we're pro-choice about is when the most innocent and helpless
human being is at stake.  Pro-choice is synonymous with pro-abortion
because no one speaks of pro-choice in any other context.  Pro-choice is a
euphemism that causes us to forget the baby."

Even the very word "truth," said the Bishop of Madison, seems to be giving
way to the word "transparency" as a goal of public discourse.

In a country where a popular President remained popular despite his
perjurious redefinitions of "sexual relations" and "alone," not to mention
his questioning of the definition of the word "is," can we hope to succeed
in resolidifying the definitions of "human," "child," and "marriage"?
Said Bishop Morlino, "The law of reason within us when given unrestricted
range cannot arrive at any other truth in the end than the truth of Jesus
Christ.  He is Risen, His victory is ours.  The challenges are difficult
but we have every reason, the reason who is Christ Himself, never to give
in to discouragement.  Our faith in which alone our reason finds total
fulfillment, that faith is our sure victory."

A Blessed Easter to all.


Joseph A. D'Agostino is Vice President for Communications at the
Population Research Institute.


_____
PRI
P.O. Box 1559
Front Royal, Va. 22630
USA
Phone: (540) 622-5240 Fax: (540) 622-2728
Email: jad@pop.org
Media Contact: Joseph A. D'Agostino
(540) 622-5240, ext. 204
Website: www.pop.org
_________
(c) 2006 Population Research Institute. Permission to reprint granted.
Redistribute widely. Credit required.
_________
If you would like to make a tax-deductible donation to PRI, please go to
http://pop.org/donate.cfm. All donations (of any size) are welcomed and
appreciated.
_________
To subscribe to the Weekly Briefing, go to:
http://pop.org/subscribe-weekly.cfm or email us at pri@pop.org and say
"Add me to your Weekly Briefing."
__________
The pro-life Population Research Institute is dedicated to ending human
rights abuses committed in the name of "family planning," and to ending
counter-productive social and economic paradigms premised on the myth of
"overpopulation."