Dear Colleague:

There is a chance that U.S. funding for international population control
could go down, since that is the Bush Administration's wish.

Steven W. Mosher
President

PRI Weekly Briefing
6 October 2006
Vol. 8, No. 39


A Cut for Population Control Money?
By Joseph A. D'Agostino

Official federal spending on overseas "population assistance," which means
population control, has a slim chance of dropping significantly in fiscal
year 2007.  The Bush Administration proposed only $357 million for such
family planning programs early this year, a significant reduction from the
$425 million it typically proposed in previous years.  Of course, the
usual suspects, unimpressed with the conclusive evidence from secular
scientists that birthrates are in free fall in most of the world,
immediately geared up to increase the amount in Congress.  Since Congress
failed to finish work on spending bills before adjourning for the fall
campaign season, the matter is still up in the air until a post-election
November session.  But it doesn't look good.

It is difficult to calculate how much of the federal budget goes to reduce
the populations of Africans, Latinos, and Asians abroad.  Much of the
money dedicated to HIV/AIDS prevention, maternal health, economic
development, and other programs actually serves to promote population
control.  Billions of dollars every year from the United States alone gets
spent on these goals, and billions more from the European Union.

Lest I seem too mean-spirited, let me say that these programs also do much
good, saving lives in the Third World.  Yet it seems population reduction
results from our foreign aid more than increase, though due to increased
longetivity, Third World populations haven't quite begun to decline yet as
Europe's already has--and any biologist knows that a long-term declining
population is a sure sign that a species is in trouble.

Just looking at official population assistance figures for the U.S. Agency
for International Development (USAID), the United States spent $429.5
million in FY2004, $437.3 million in FY2005, and an estimated $435.6
million in FY2006 (Congress likes to spend more than the President
requests).  This year, Bush asked for a lot less.  He wanted $357 million
for FY2007, and didn't ask for any extra money for the UNFPA even though
Congress keeps appropriating funds for it.  As authorized by the
Kemp-Kasten provision of law, Bush has been withholding funds from UNFPA
because of its support for China's forced abortion and sterilization
policy, and he finally eliminated it as a line item.

In May, the U.S. House Appropriations Committee increased the Bush
Administration's amount to $432 million.  That how it stands now, since
the House passed in June HR 5522, the FY2007 Foreign Operations
Appropriations bill.  All appropriations bills originate in the House, not
the Senate.

The Senate has yet to take action on HR 5522.  In fact, Congress passed
only two out of 11 appropriations bills before leaving Washington to
campaign.  It is now no longer unusual for Congress to keep wrangling over
spending bills well after the new fiscal year for them has begun.

The Foreign Operations Appropriations bill should be passed by Congress in
mid- or late November.  It seems likely that Bush's bid to decrease
population control funding in an era of rapidly declining birthrates will
fail.

This despite the alarming trends in the Third World.  The old myths won't
die.  Even small-town newspapers repeat them constantly.  "Family planning
has been so effective that, because of efforts to educate women and
couples about contraception so that they can choose to have the number of
kids they want at the time they want them, birthrates have fallen in many
developing nations," celebrated an article in the Augusta, Ga. Free Press
this month calling for even more population control.  "In Mexico and
Egypt, for example, birthrates have been halved in the last 35 years. . .
."

The article doesn't mention that Mexico is committing suicide-her
birthrate is now below replacement level.  And Egypt's will probably
follow suit within two decades.

Says the anti-population growth Population Action International, "Whatever
one's view about population as an issue, few people fervently wish the
world were home to a lot more human beings than it is.  Some may wonder if
another Mahatma Gandhi or an Albert Einstein or a Mother Theresa missed
out on being born due to the declining global birthrates of the past few
decades.  But most know that such a question is fundamentally unanswerable
and don't stay awake at night thinking about it."

The more people there are, the more likely it is that a genius will be
born.  Of course, it is true that the question above is fundamentally
unanswerable.  We don't know if we are missing a great man or woman
because of population control.  But we do know what we will be missing
soon: workers.  According to the pro-population control United Nations,
the proportion of the world's population between 15 and 24-those who are
about to enter or who have just entered the workforce-will decline from
17.9% today to 15.3% in just 20 years.  At the same time, those 65 or over
will go from 7.4% to 10.5%.  And the trend will continue indefinitely
afterwards.  Thus the global labor squeeze will begin.

U.S. taxpayer dollars should not be spent on making it worse.


Joseph A. D'Agostino is Vice President for Communications at the
Population Research Institute.

________
PRI
P.O. Box 1559
Front Royal, Va. 22630
USA
Phone: (540) 622-5240 Fax: (540) 622-2728
Email: jad@pop.org
Media Contact: Joseph A. D'Agostino
(540) 622-5240, ext. 204
Website: www.pop.org
_________
(c) 2006 Population Research Institute. Permission to reprint granted.
Redistribute widely. Credit required.
_________
If you would like to make a tax-deductible donation to PRI, please go to
http://pop.org/donate.cfm. All donations (of any size) are welcomed and
appreciated. _________
To subscribe to the Weekly Briefing, go to:
http://pop.org/subscribe-weekly.cfm or email us at pri@pop.org and say
"Add me to your Weekly Briefing."
The pro-life Population Research Institute is dedicated to ending human
rights abuses committed in the name of "family planning," and to ending
counter-productive social and economic paradigms premised on the myth of
"overpopulation."