Dear Colleague:

Population growth benefits America, whatever the flaws of our current
immigration system.

Steven W. Mosher
President

PRI Weekly Briefing
13 October 2006
Vol. 8, No. 40


300 Million and Immigration: Separating the Issues
By Joseph A. D'Agostino


America's population will reach 300 million people on Tuesday morning.
Those of us who see people as a resource will celebrate, especially since
we recognize the need for more workers to support America's baby boomers
in their impending retirement.  Yet even many who have a pro-people
attitude and recognize our worsening worker-retiree ratio have problems
with America's current immigration levels.  Sometimes, this spills over
into hostility toward population growth per se.  It's past time to
separate these two issues, and be glad our nation is not dying out like
those of Europe.

The simple point: Population growth for America is good, while large
numbers of unassimilated or unproductive immigrants are bad.  Yet without
some immigration, the United States' population would continue aging
indefinitely because her birthrate is so low.  Even when accounting for
the higher birthrate of immigrants, Americans' Total Fertility Rate is
only 2.0 children per woman during her lifetime, on average.  That is
slightly less than the 2.1 needed for replacement.  Remove all the
immigrants, and Americans' birthrate drops to suicidal French levels.

It's true that the USA has experienced a massive increase in her
foreign-born population since 1965, when Congress liberalized immigration
laws.  Contrary to what you might think, most immigration into the United
States is legal, accounting for about one million new residents a year.
The Census Bureau estimates that "only" 500,000 illegal immigrants settle
in the United States annually--although this may have gone up in the past
few years as illegal immigration increases.  Right now, about 35 million
residents of the USA are foreign-born, a high 11.7% of the population.

According to the invaluable Center for Immigration Studies (CIS), "Since
1970, more than 30 million legal and illegal immigrants have settled in
the U.S., representing more than one-third of all people ever to come to
America's shores.  At the peak of the Great Wave of immigration in 1910,
the number of immigrants living in the U.S. was less than half of what it
is today, though the percentage of the population was slightly higher."
Of course, native-born Americans had much higher fertility back then,
making immigrant children easier to assimilate.

And now, says CIS, "The annual arrival of 1.5 million legal and illegal
immigrants, coupled with 750,000 annual births to immigrant women, is the
determinate factor--or three-fourths--of all U.S. population growth."
Those who complain that Americans have too many children haven't looked at
the facts.  Our birthrate is low and most of our population growth has
come from increased longetivity-Americans have never lived longer-and
immigration.  As baby boomers' children finish graduating from school, the
proportion of school-age children who are offspring of immigrants will
rise, providing the next pool of American taxpayers.

So America's population growth problems-suburban sprawl, crowded roads and
schools, environmental degradation-are due to immigrants?  Not at all.
Immigrants have worsened some of America's problems, but none are due to
population growth per se.  The problems of suburban sprawl and the
accompanying congestion have come because of local governments' halt to
planning properly for growth more than anything else, but also because of
America's divorce revolution doubling many households, the movement of
people away from rural areas, and Americans' desire for ever-larger homes
(see Weekly Briefing "The Small Problem of Suburban Sprawl," Sep. 15,
2006).  Yet, by 2050 at current rates of consumption, only 5.7% of
America's land will be built up (currently 4.7% is).  Discovered natural
resources and environmental quality have been increasing in the United
States for decades, but that will be the subject of a future article.

America's population growth, in and of itself, is a good thing.  The
anti-people population control lobby should keep in mind the simple
reality that the United States cannot survive without people.  And even at
the current rate of population increase of about 0.9% a year, we face a
population crunch over the next few decades.  According to the House
Budget Committee, our worker-to-retiree ratio was 5 to 1 in 1960.  In
2002, it reached 3 to 1, a 40% drop.  And by 2050, it is projected to be 2
to 1, a further 33% drop.  That's why Social Security and Medicare will go
bankrupt (see Weekly Briefing "300 Million, Social Security, and
Solvency," Sep. 28, 2006).  America needs more young people and, unless
Americans produce them themselves by having more children, some will have
to be imported.

That does not mean the USA should continue importing immigrants
indiscriminately.  First of all, our 11 million (or more) illegal aliens
are a major drain on the U.S. economy and live in an unlawful underworld.
Next, according to CIS, immigrants are far more likely to have not
completed high school than native-born Americans, 57% more likely to be
poor, 2.5 times more likely to lack health insurance, and more likely to
be on welfare.  Mounting evidence proves the obvious, that high
immigration levels depress the wages of Americans at the low end of the
economic scale, particularly many blacks.  The baby boomers with their
penchants for big government and small families are already in danger of
bankrupting us; we don't need another population doing the same.

Most disturbingly perhaps, recent immigrants aren't making America
younger.  "Without the 7.9 million post-2000 immigrants, the average age
in America would be virtually unchanged at 36 years," says CIS.  American
immigration policy should change to favor those with special skills that
will contribute most to our economy and healthy young people who will
spend a lifetime assimilating and paying taxes here, since we are going to
need those workers soon.  It should disfavor the uneducated, the
middle-aged and old without special skills, and those from Muslim and
other countries whose populations hate America.  And, of course,
multiculturalism should be abolished and replaced with the old
tried-and-true melting pot model if America is to avoid balkanization.

In other words, America's immigration policy should be tweaked to benefit
America, not undermine her.  At the same time, those persecuted in foreign
lands should still have a chance to make it to freedom here.  Just wanting
a higher-paying job isn't enough.

As the populations of Europe and Japan shrink, we should celebrate
America's continuing healthy population growth.  We will not wither away
like most of the rest of the Western world.


Joseph A. D'Agostino is Vice President for Communications at the
Population Research Institute.

________
PRI
P.O. Box 1559
Front Royal, Va. 22630
USA
Phone: (540) 622-5240 Fax: (540) 622-2728
Email: jad@pop.org
Media Contact: Joseph A. D'Agostino
(540) 622-5240, ext. 204
Website: www.pop.org
_________
(c) 2006 Population Research Institute. Permission to reprint granted.
Redistribute widely. Credit required.
_________
If you would like to make a tax-deductible donation to PRI, please go to
http://pop.org/donate.cfm. All donations (of any size) are welcomed and
appreciated. _________
To subscribe to the Weekly Briefing, go to:
http://pop.org/subscribe-weekly.cfm or email us at pri@pop.org and say
"Add me to your Weekly Briefing."
The pro-life Population Research Institute is dedicated to ending human
rights abuses committed in the name of "family planning," and to ending
counter-productive social and economic paradigms premised on the myth of
"overpopulation."